The US Government Planned and Carried Out the 9/11 Attacks

The US Government Planned and Carried Out the 9/11 Attacks

Postby FatFreddy » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:35 pm

The following link provides a complete list of topics on this forum:

http://www.preearth.net/phpBB3/search.php?search_id=newposts


Look at this picture of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blo ... _plane.jpg

It's too pointed to be the nose of a 757.
http://www.caverca.com/Images/Boeing%20 ... V%2001.jpg

The photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon was taken with a fish-eye lens which causes some distortion but the rest of the objects in the picture are not distorted to the same degree as the nose of a 757 would have to be to have that shape. The shadow line is visible under the nose and it's consistent with the shadow of the Pentagon.

The picture is consistent with these analyses.
http://www.physics911.net/missingwings
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Arti ... h2006.html

Also, we know that the Pentagon is about 75 feet high and that a 757 is about 150 feet long. If we look at the section of the Pentagon where the plane hit in the picture at the top of this page...
http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm

...and compare it with the space behind the box where the aircraft is, we can see that a 757 couldn't fit in that space without the nose protruding out front. The plane in the space behind the box is much too short to be a 757.

A 757 would look like this.
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/pe ... amscam.jpg

This analysis makes it pretty clear that a 757 wouldn't fit behind the box.
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

Also, if you look at the fourth picture from the top on this page, you'll see the hole made by the craft.
http://www.physics911.net/missingwings

There would have been some damage from the wings of a 757. Look at the damage caused by the 767 on the side of the tower.
http://jabbajoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834 ... 95d8834-pi

There's quite a difference.

Here's a blown up photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
http://www.sott.net/signs/editorials/si ... volved.php
(excerpt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it more clear now? Can you see Flight 77 in all its glory? All we can see is an amorphous white blob that looks more like a car than the nose cone of any aircraft. Obviously the images are too grainy to be of any use to anyone. At this point then, the most we can say is that an amorphous white blob with definite Islamic terrorists leanings hit the Pentagon on 9/11.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with the person who wrote that it doesn't prove that a 757 hit the Pentagon but I disagree with his saying the photo isn't of any use to anyone. If we look at the high-resolution picture, it's obviously the nose of a fighter-type craft.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blo ... _plane.jpg

Look at the second picture from the top on this page.
http://insider-outsider.blogspot.com/20 ... hould.html

I know the scale is wrong and the 757 is too big but it gives us an idea of what we should have seen in the video released by the government considering all the cameras that surround the Pentagon.
At the 3:55 time mark of this video it's pointed out that there were lots of cameras at the Pentagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNsSn6D3CP4

They must have footage of the craft hitting the Pentagon. They just don't want us to see it because we'll know it wasn't a 757.

These three articles are important.
http://www.physics911.net/omholt
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06/wh ... tagon.html
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are some good documentaries in this link.
http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm

Be sure to watch "9/11 Mysteries" and "Painful Deceptions".

This stuff below is good too. The first two deal with the "Thermite" issue which is important.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 1184881047
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSh5o6ca8FM
http://www.wtc7.net/articles/WhyIndeed09.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9t_i08d1xc
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06/wh ... tagon.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGvXVzdlcQk
(8 parts)

In this clip the representative from NIST is playing dumb about the pools of molten steel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAS4TIYF68A

Here's a 6 part video about group of arquitects that think 9/11 was in inside job.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhPlV99AVQE

I think that those people who put forth the no-plane theory, etc are governnment disinfo agents trying to cause disruption in the 9/11 truth movement. If there are some wacko theories out there that make the official version look logical by comparison, fewer people will join the truth movement.
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/vi ... php?t=1222

This article deals with that subject.
http://pseudonautics.blogspot.com/2008/ ... iques.html
(excerpt)
--------------------------------------------------------------
The best way to harm a cause is to defend it using wrong arguments.
This is why, every time there is a government conspiracy, you have a load of kooks making ridiculous claims to discredit critics by association.
Concerning 911, you have pod people, holograms, WTC nuclear devices, and directed energy weapons from space.
--------------------------------------------------------------

So does this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A
(7:22 and 9:32 time marks)

They pulled off the 9/11 attack so they would have a pretext to invade the Middle East to get control of the oil there. This is an old story.

http://video.google.es/videosearch?q=terror+storm#
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO301A.html
http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ/ag ... genemy.htm

Here's some stuff about the history of US and British meddling in the Middle East.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 5741878159
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oi ... istory.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/is ... hindex.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/irqindx.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oi ... iniraq.htm
http://www.war-times.org/pdf/Oil%20leaflet.pdf
http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/inte ... ection.htm

These two are important.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 3439292490
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jle47NiSNSQ

Here's some more stuff.
http://killtown.911review.org/911links.html#forums

http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/claim.html
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2005/11/wh ... s-hit.html
http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/theories.html#5
http://www.netctr.com/media.html
http://www.netctr.com/911exposed.html
FatFreddy
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:04 pm

Return to Current Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron